Nick Boel wrote to Dr. What <=-

Still unknowingly. This is probably the majority of the cases you've
been /hearing/ about.

My confusion here is over the concern about fentanyl.

Ex: Take someone who is an alcaholic but has little to no income. So when he gets money, he buys the cheapest booze he can get. He gets some laced with too much anti-freeze and dies.

I don't condider that a problem. He was dying anyway. If he had plenty of money to get good booze, he still would have died.

It still doesn't make it right. In fact, it probably falls under 'premeditated murder'.

I'm not applying a "right vs. wrong". I'm saying that someone who participates in a risky habit has to accept that risk. That fentanyl increases those risks does not make it a "crisis".

They were going to die from the heroin anyway.

More than likely not until it hits closer to home.

No matter who it is, if someone plays on a busy road and gets creamed by a truck, he got what he earned. He put himself in harms way with a conscious act.


... New religion? I haven't used up the old one, yet!
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)